I ought not to be surprised by my own redundancy, but I am. I am increasing aware that I, like thousands of others my age, am falling behind in a world where communication means cyber, or electronic, rather than interpersonal.
Two
incidents crashed together recently, to underline the extent to which
my old world values are becoming redundant. Firstly, a daughter
announces her marriage to the world (over Facebook), without a thought
of privately mentioning this to her father. Secondly, a husband learns
of his wife missing her father, over Facebook, again with no thought
that the husband ought to have been made aware before an announcement
was made to friends and strangers in cyberspace.
Simple
demonstrations of respect, and inter-familial communication, seem to be
eroded by a world in which instant gratification comes at the click of a
mouse, and demonstrations that people (whom you have never met) in
cyberspace become more important than those who you are living with. In
my creeping dotage I find that quite perverse.
Admittedly
my generation would talk for hours on the telephone. That was in the
time of the Western world when four old pennies would bring chums,
living fifteen miles apart, together for an evening in the privacy of a
red telephone booth. Now it would seem that the handset/mobile phone has
become more important, with its interconnectivity and all-time access
to cyberspace, than the person you are sitting in front of. The distant
caller becomes closer than the physically and emotionally close.
I
am not the first to point out that the new forms of digital
communication are actually hindering interpersonal and family
communication. You only have to visit a food court, here in Malaysia, to
see just how distant people are becoming to those physically near, and
how near they become to those physically absent. It is a complete
reversal from the age in which I was brought up. Parents sit, ignoring
each other and their children, while they gossip or place ‘important’
telephone calls above the needs of personal relationships. Those
children, in turn, sit and play computer games on hand phones or on
computer tablets. They interact less and less. Mothers drive glued to
their telephones, while their children tap away at the latest game.
Passengers not inclined to ‘game’ and cut out from the telephone
conversation look on in bewilderment, and sadness.
Full-time
connectivity is meaning less and less interpersonal interaction. Is
this an addiction? Are the constant phone callers mainlining on their
drug of choice - cyber-communication? Could these people who feel a
desperate need to be in constant contact be as addicted as any heroin
addict, or computer game addict? These are serious and concerning
questions.
Recently,
due to hacking, I was forced to reduce my Facebook ‘friends’ from over
900 to just 7. It was then, as I closed my original account and started a
fresh one, that I became aware of the near addiction ‘Likes’ and
comments have become, to some. And the need, by others, to parade the
most intimate details of their lives before complete strangers, and
‘friends’ barely met.
It
is a new world, but I am not sure if it is ‘Brave’. In our newly
constructed 1984 we are informed of the massive amount of government
‘spying’ done through the digital media; informed also that companies in
Bangladesh and Cairo manufacture ‘Likes’ for cash, on Facebook. These
indicate that privacy is no longer private, and ‘Social Media’ like
Facebook may be fuelling a rush towards antisocial behaviour, deceit and
snooping. This is not the world my father went to war for, nor the
world that my ‘Hippy’ contemporaries wished to create in their ‘high’
visions of Utopia. It is, however, a world in which I find myself
increasingly redundant.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.